~ Images finding on the web as art and passion ~ 
~ Advertisement debunking ~
  
  
  
  
  |       | 
     | 
    | 
     | 
  
  essays | 
  
(Courtesy of fravia's  
searchlore.org)
  
  
Searching and understanding Advertisement, 
"The quiet harbour", 
 an 
advertisement debunking assignment
by G. Bidwell and fravia+
 
Part of the finding images 
section and of the antiadvertisement section. 
published @ searchlores 
in December 2004, Version 1, december 2004
  
    Introduction    
        The image      
          The final solution    
          
          Other, related assignements: The chick on the river    The head of the crab 
             What do we sell?
 Introduction  
This is part of a workshop that I made, together with Bidwell, in a french university some weeks ago.
 (Images finding on the web as art and passion ~ Advertisement debunking)
Can you find/guess/infere the advertisement below?  What is it, what does it mean? 
As Bidwell pointed out to me, there 
are enough data IN THE IMAGE ITSELF to allow seekers  to solve the 
assignment, i. e. finding what this is about, even without 
finding the advertisement itself, which is probably true, comet 
to think of it, though 
such statements are always easy... once you have gained 
knowledge 
ex 
post.
I  beg those (hopefully very few) among our readers that 
should 
happen 
to already, fortuitously, KNOW where this advertisement comes from and 
what 
exactly it represents:  
please 
 *refrain* from hinting or publishing the solution on our 
 messageboard  
 and try to solve instead, for instance, our previous "sommertime" images searching challenge... (until now still 
 unsolved). 
The declared purpose of this image 'assignment' (part of a recent "advertisement debunking" workshop of mine) is to test viewers' ability to "debunk" images, 
which is in itself a useful skill in our "images bombarded" society. 
So what's in this image? Why should they have done it? 
 What does it represent, which 'levers' is it supposed to move in the subconscious of the viewer? Answering 
these questions will make it easy to understand where the image may come from. And what it should mean, and what probably it has been used for...
The image is ORIGINAL and has NOT been edited nor modified, nor alterated in any way... just  scaled and cropped by me, and not too much: 
just a little (~ 2-3 cm) *below*, 
and no cropping at all elsewhere.
  
 The image  
 
 
 
    
    
     
    
  (c) 1952-2032: [fravia+], all 
rights
  reserved, reversed, revealed, reviled, revelled & revoked